- Performance Indicators by Operational Priority
- Further Information on the Assessment of Compliance
- Organizational Contact Information
4.1 Performance Indicators by Operational Priority
| Associated SO(s) |
Operational Priorities |
Performance Indicators |
| All Strategic Outcomes |
- Design and deliver risk-based inspection and surveillance services
- Improve compliance through compliance management activities
- Modernize the Agency's regulatory components and tools
- Increase transparency and strengthen strategic partnerships and
communications with key partners, and stakeholders
- Develop a workforce and workplace such that the Agency is innovative, more
effective and well-managed
|
Program Activity: Food Safety and Nutrition
Risks
- Extent to which inspected federally registered establishments comply with
federal food safety requirements (5 Sub Indicators)
- Extent to which domestic and imported food products comply with federal
chemical residue requirements (7 Sub Indicators)
- Time taken to issue public warnings for Class I recalls
- Extent to which nutrition information on non-registered food products
inspected is accurate.
Program Activity: Zoonotics Risk
- Number of incidents of avian influenza that expand beyond the initial
control zone
Program Activity: Animal Health Risk and Production
System
- Extent to which the CFIA's data indicates
that foreign regulated animal diseases have entered Canada via specified
regulated pathways
- Extent to which the CFIA's data indicates the
spread of foreign regulated animal diseases that entered into Canada this
fiscal year.
- Extent to which renderers and feed mills inspected are without any major
deviations with respect to the Feeds Regulations and the Health of Animals
Regulations (enhanced feed ban) (2 Sub Indicators)
Program Activity: Plant Health Risk and Production
System
- Extent to which CFIA data indicates the entry
and establishment of new and foreign regulated plant diseases and pests into
Canada (listed diseases/pests in the Regulated Pest List for Canada)
- Extent of change in the presence of regulated plant diseases or pests
beyond the regulated areas
- Extent to which Plant Health risks identified by the CFIA (within and outside
Canada) are communicated to the affected stakeholders
Program Activity: Biodiversity Protection
- Percentage of inspections of novel products that demonstrate compliance
with the requirements and standards outlined in the respective authorizations
for experimental purposes (4 Sub Indicators)
Program Activity: Integrated Regulatory Frame work
- Percentage of regulatory initiatives that meet publication requirements for
either the Canada Gazette, Part I or Part II
Program Activity: Domestic and International Market
Access
- Extent to which the net quantity, composition, labelling and advertising of
non-registered food products inspected is accurate.
- Extent to which certified food, animal and plant shipments meet the
receiving country's import requirements (5 Sub Indicators)
|
4.2 Further Information on the Assessment of Compliance
As a regulatory agency, the principal means by which the CFIA carries out its mandate
is by measuring rates of compliance with Canadian food, animal, and plant
legislative requirements. The CFIA promotes compliance by
conducting inspections, audits, product sampling and verifications. The
CFIA also carries
out education and awareness activities to increase regulated parties'
understanding of statutory requirements and standards. Compliance rates are an
indicator of the extent to which regulated parties have adhered to federal acts
and regulations. The CFIA takes the following
approaches to assessing compliance:
- Monitoring: Establishments or products are inspected, sampled and tested in
such a way that the resulting compliance rates are representative of the
CFIA-regulated
population. Monitoring programs provide an accurate overview of compliance in
the marketplace in general.
- Targeting: In cases where monitoring has identified significant compliance
problems, the CFIA
takes a targeted approach to inspections, sampling and testing by focusing on
the problem area and areas of highest risk. Non-compliant establishments or
products are often sought out for targeting to better define problem areas and
reasons for non-compliance. For this reason, compliance rates of targeted
programs are typically lower. Improved compliance is promoted through
enforcement actions.
- Investigating: Investigations are undertaken for the purposes of
prosecution for non-compliance, which includes gathering evidence and
information from a variety of sources considered relevant to a suspected
violation or offence.
The methods for determining compliance reflect the level and type of risks
associated with the food or agricultural products being assessed. The specific
methods the CFIA
uses to determine compliance are outlined below:
- Compliance results are determined during the initial inspection;
- Compliance results are determined during the CFIA follow up visit
conducted after the initial inspection;
- Compliance results are determined during the initial testing of food and
product samples; and
- Compliance results are determined on an annual basis, following a
correction period after the end of the fiscal year.
Varying by program, non-compliance can be determined if:
- There is a violation that poses a significant health and safety concern;
and
- There is any violation even if it is not health and safety related.
Where compliance rates appear in this report, the relevant method used to
assess compliance has been noted.
When CFIA
inspectors determine that a regulated party is non-compliant, that party is
required to take corrective action. If non-compliance persists, Agency
inspectors have a variety of tools at their disposal. In a graduated approach,
these tools range from procedural actions including letters of non-compliance,
seizure and detention, suspension/cancellation of
licences/registrations/permits and recommending prosecution.
The complexity of the agri-food sector and the inherent variability of the
biological and production systems underpinning it are such that some degree of
non-compliance is inevitable. A compliance rate of less than one hundred per
cent means that some proportion of the facilities or products inspected by the
CFIA has failed to
meet certain requirements or standards as defined by the legislation. Major
variances have the potential to pose a significant risk to human, animal or
plant health and/or other program objectives. These are always met with
vigorous enforcement actions to assure protection of Canadians and the plant
and animal resource base. Some deficiencies represent minor variances and do
not pose a significant risk to human, animal or plant health.
It is critical to note that the nature of the CFIA's mandated
responsibilities is dynamic, given their basis in biological and production
systems that are ever-changing. The inherent variability of these systems makes
them difficult to predict and it is reasonable to expect some shift in
compliance from year to year. The specificity of targets and reported results
must be considered in this context.
4.3 Organizational Contact Information
Contact the Canadian Food Inspection Agency via:
Telephone from Monday to Friday 08:00 to 20:00 Eastern time:
Toll Free: 1-800-442-2342
NCR: 1-613-225-2342
TTY: 1-800-465-7735
Internet: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/util/contact/commene.shtml